Idealistic Politics Essay

The bill of all(prenominal) hitherto active lodge is the explanation of crystallize struggles, said Karl Marx, who is considered to be one and just now(a) of the valets most seminal thinkers. Marx categorized these crystallisees in ii broad categories the outstandingistie versus the proletariats, the upper class strange to the lower class and the caste that slang access to the factors of production against everybody else who argon compelled to sell their labor. In governmental terms the bourgeois were the committee for managing the general affairs of the upstanding bourgeoisie (Marx, 20) and in roam to reduce every friction, tension or exemption towards their supremacy they then laid down a set of paragons and value for all classes and citizens. The ultimate terminus of having a mo nononous set of principles was to disintegrate existing patterns and determine by instigating the proletariats to fully accept the bourgeois set of principles by suspending their own. History, however, has yet to see some(prenominal)(prenominal) an outcome where the bourgeois triumph in instigating such vertical deal successfully.What glide bys in such circumstances kinda is a conflict due to inconsistency that occurs between the dogmas of both classes whereby the reality tail endd patterns of the proletariats clashes with the wishful thinkeric values of the bourgeoisie. These conflicts in rhythm affect the policy-making ideologies and actions since the governance is the arena where the battle of principles occurs, principally due to devil reasons. The first being that these conflicts will non rear in the first ordain except in the political arena due to the austere genius and secondly the outcomes will not be veritable unless(prenominal) at a level were they are make public and irreversible. Evidence of these conflicts exists in our texts and films, however in differing contexts.In Antigone, Creon represents the bourgeoisie and Antig one the proletariats in A confabulation on the Moral Effects of the homosexualistic discipline and Sciences the liberal arts and sciences were the corrupting vales instigated by the intellectuals whilst the savage being was the unenlightened and nave proletariat, and finally in Marxs communist Manifesto where the distinctions are extremely clear among the two classes. In the course of my paper I inclination to examine the specialisation and weakness of severally of these ensample societies and their implications to political ideology and action.The values of Karl Marxs idealist communist family may be summed up in the single sentence Abolition of hugger-mugger attribute (Marx, 34). He believed that once private self-possession was abolished deal would change, and this would finally end the history of all class struggles. socialism to Marx was an extension or a purer form of fondism, whereby the trusty deal owned every occasion and everybody worked for the corpse, hence no form of personal interests was vested in the system. This assumption was make by placing a gamble on homo awakenuals behavior, probably the most unpredictable factor to place any form of profitr on. Marx was assuming that among a whole class of people no interests were expose and apart from those of the proletariat as a whole (Marx, 33). The confederacy that Marx visualized was one where all the citizens liking simply the interests of the society by not desiring to settle with their personal interests.History, however, does not consume a pedestal for pure sociableism where a group of people have ceased to exist without any possessions and have lived single by the idea the closest analogy one could give would be of hunter-ga therer societies. These societies, however, existed during the prehistoric times where human attitudes and behaviours were not being perpetually reshaped by the ever-changing economic systems in which people find themselves nowadays, which M arx himself mentions as there being no such thing as fixed human nature. Therefore, communism could never work be cook it goes against human nature. People are of course more competitive than cooperative. Moreover, the possibility for revolution to occur where the bourgeoisie were to come down in their companionable status to the level of the proletariats and the proletariats rise to eminence of the bourgeoisies could but occur if human nature were to be dismantled, self memories be wiped out and in some other lyric poem for the revolution to occur successfully in ineluctably to be self induced.Marx in an indirect dash implies how ones self worth has rock-bottom with the current system when he discusses the dynamics of wage labour and whether it creates property for the laborer. He states that the system is self-defeating for the laborers, which cannot increase except upon condition of begetting a new(a) supply of wage-laborer for fresh exploitation (Marx 34). If we were t o refer dorsum to the analogy hunter-gatherer societies the fruits of ones labour were nimble when an various(prenominal) hunted his reward was quick and did not wait for his fruits or live only in so far as the interest of the ruling class gather ups it (Marx. 35). In short mans worth and dignity has been demoralized and every idiosyncratic has been converted in paid wage laborersand has rock-bottomrelationss to a mere money relations (Marx, 21).Individuals were not bounded by the social status hunter-gatherer since everyone divided up and everyone knew their worth. The advantage of this system is that it does not create any room for friction to occur because it does not imply the idea of psyches desiring to wish to control the environment or vest any personal interests into the system. This can primarily be attributed to the value the system advocates of not regard to differentiate people to a lower place any circumstances the system does not know race, ethnicity and differences of age and sex no longer have any distinctive social validity (Marx, 26), a trait of hunter-gatherer societies, which Marx so dearly desires.These values would in turn affect the political ideologies of a system trying to covert to communism by picking on the one necessity condition for the existenceof the bourgeois class, the formation and the augmentation of superior the condition for capital is wage labour (Marx, 32). Therefore, the conflicts that would plagiarize would be those that regarding wage labour and its supply the bourgeoisie would advocate any action that would enhance the rival between laborers the key behind keeping a continuous supply of wage labour opposed to the proletariats immediate aim of gash off this supply and by doing so ensuring its immediate aim of overthrowing the bourgeois supremacy. Any decline in wage labour would threaten the bourgeoisies capital by reducing its turnover, hence weakening their foothold in the marketplace in turn inh ibiting their ability to constantly revolutionize the instruments of production in order to exist and survive (Marx, 21).The bourgeoisie quest to explore a continuous wage labour would see a shift in their political ideology they would seek to manipulate cities, provinces and other nations that are weak cause them to become dependent on them. The consequence of such political centralization would lead to the epidemic of overproduction, whereby the only manner in which the crises can be outstrip is by the conquest of new markets, and by the and by the more through exploitation of the old ones (Marx, 25).However, such exploitation of markets can occur only to a certain limit, until other nations impose regulations confiding the system to resort to desperate measures and turmoil, which occurred with China. Chinese products flooded the innovation market until recently and now they have been rejected entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) and do not enjoy the benefits of free t rade. Therefore, China have used enforced destruction of a circle of productive forces (Marx, 25) to decrease their output, which has lead to a pass on of turmoil inside the country with dogmas of the government political stability and international recognition and the working class subsistence and a better life clashing against each other further depressing the situation.Like Karl Marx, J.J. Rousseau in like manner painted a picture of ideal society. In his Discourse on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences he condemns how societies have succumbed to arts and sciences that have work our behavior, and taught our passions to speak an artificial language (Rousseau, 6) with the desire to enthrall one another with performances worthy of their mutual cheers (Rousseau, 4). He believed that individuals were imprisoned in the values and ideals of society that the arts and sciences strengthened, whereby everyone followed and nobody dared to be prompted by their familiar selv es in order not be seen as outcasts, resulting in man losing his individuality.In a nutshell, Rousseau believed that the arts and sciences had tainted origins and they reinforced our crimes by fostering our desire for comfort by transforming individuals into sugar coated pills, whereby jealousy, suspicion, fear, coldness, reserve, detest and fraud lie constantly concealed under the uniform and deceitful veil of niceness (Rousseau, 7). He in turn pictured a society were he believed man was innately pious was not restrained by societys decorousness therefore abandoning the possibilities o the vices that evolve in ripe societies are nonexistent. He understood virtue in terms of bravery, courage and strength in other words he saw it in rude(prenominal) military power.The weaknesses in Rousseaus flick of the ideal society are the assumptions that are embedded in the question that he was addressing Whether the restoration of the arts and sciences has had the inwardness of purifyin g or corrupting ethical motive? Rousseau has to move into that there has been a revival in the arts as well as assume a relationship between abstract and applied association with morality that being the human behavior and usance a society embraces. Such assumptions lead Rousseau to base his rivalry on a set of contradictions. He idealized the values of the Persians, Germans and Spartans who had an unusual social mental synthesis where there was no study of abstract education, no accumulation of property and military virtues were emphasized. The idealizations of such societies contradicted his tartness for etiquette or what he referred to as the veil of politeness, since there exists no organization whereby more discipline, etiquette or order to our rude but natural morals is required than military organizations.Throughout the discourse the paper of man becoming corrupt once he enters society and losing his individuality because they all act the aforesaid(prenominal) under th e same circumstances alike (Rousseau, 6) is repeatedly emphasized. This argument in itself is self-defeating because if it is the grouping of people that induces people to conceal themselves and live among uncertainty, Rousseaus ideal society would truly only function for obscure individuals since such a level of purity could not occur in the natural dynamics of human societies. When individuals interact, the views and ideals of others will indeed affect the way the individual will live his life, since it is part of human nature to conform to the rules and regulations of others, which are a collection of ideals and values that compromise the principles of society.For a society to function in harmony there has to be some crude ground whereby all the different members of that society essential conform to and must impart some of their individual ideals for the betterment of the society. Rousseau argues that man would not have to sacrifice his own ideals if he was not placed in the blasphemies of modern societies since he assumes humans are genuinely good and everyone would approve of the actions of others. This in itself breaks Rousseaus argument since there is exists no yardstick to measure good and even if there were to exist such a measure, differences on which good is appropriate would in turn cause conflicts.The simplicity of the society Rousseau describes is its initial strength the simpler ones life, the palette on which he is to express his severeness perspectives becomes less like the American savageswho live only when on the products of the chaseand yoke, indeed, cannot be imposed on men who stand in need of goose egg (Rousseau,5). In a society where the needs do not exceed the basic physiological, safety and social needs and are readily satisfied the room for rotting becomes minimal. Therefore, I believe Rousseaus onset on the arts and sciences is not so much on their origins or sources but more so on how it manages to widen our needs to incl ude self-actualization and self-realisation needs, which are needs that are satisfied by luxuries and how we appear in relation to the people ring us a need where the veil and corruption required to have those needs satisfied.Rousseaus painting of such an ideal society would not require a political system, however if all his assumptions were hang the political implications would be drastic. In politics rarely is something said literally and in a society where the members innately believe that everyone is sincerely good, would not be capable of reading between the lines and would end up in turmoil since other nations would manipulate their naivety. Furthermore, in a society where abstract knowledge such a geometry and economics is not taught the politicians will be incapable(p) of drawing upon actions that will be prefer their society, since politics is the evil of all sciences and without a good base in its basic terminology that being the abstract sciences one will be incapa ble of mastering it and using it to his advantage.Speak from their heart go bad someone.do not take careIn Antigone the Greek tragedy, morals, egos, and gender issues were the epics around which principles were based upon. get along one manHarun Al Rashid..Mamluks..they use to be all loyalLower class has less say in the political era in order to stop the formation of proletariats which is so crucial for the revolution to occur.Political laws that protect private propertyEnhance competitiveness (p.21)Dependence of poor countries on rich (.23)Eradicate opposition immediately forcefulness of prletarits p.28 trade unionsp.32 existence remains on capital1) Basecaus they lay down ideals that seem utopian only to them, they forget2) Might have noticed that there are more cons than prosSeveral of our texts paint images of ideal human society. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these imagined societies. How do these imagined ideal societies interact with political ideology and politica l action.BibliographyMarx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto. bare-assed York Bantam, 1992.Sophocles. The Three Theban Plays Antigone, Oedipus The King, Oedipus at Colonus. Trans. RobertFagles. New York Penguin, 1977.Communism Could Never work Because it goes against human nature. People are naturally more competitive than cooperative. http//www.wsu.edu/brians/hum_303/nature.html